Coldwell Banker
Mobile: 213-304-0126
Office: 323-906-2431
Fax: 323-666-4955

THE DIVIDED AMERICAN DREAM

Category : Uncategorized

San Francisco’s long shadow
The nation’s biggest housing winners and losers live only 80 miles apart. The miraculous housing boom in San Francisco and Silicon Valley helped fuel a similar bubble in nearby Stockton. But when the housing market collapsed, only families in Stockton were left suffering — and still do today.

Altamont Pass. (Preston Gannaway/GRAIN/For The Washington Post)

By Emily Badger Wonkblog April 28, 2016
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google Plus Share via Email More Options
STOCKTON, Calif. — East of San Francisco, beyond the Bay Area’s rabid housing market and high-tech office parks, is a different California where the air is hotter, the land is cheaper and the homeowners are enduring a more precarious version of the American dream.

You get there on Interstate 580, through 80 miles of suburbs and farmland, up into the bald hills of the Diablo Range that are suitable for neither. The highway, eight lanes wide, cuts through at the Altamont Pass, 1,009 feet above sea level. And then the hills part and California’s Central Valley comes into view: an unexpectedly flat landscape that feels very far from San Francisco, and where Stockton and its neighbors are still suffering the lingering effects of the worst housing bust in the nation.

The low ridgeline is a physical barrier between unequal fortunes, between record housing riches in the Bay Area and an epidemic of lost wealth in the Central Valley. Home values have doubled in some San Francisco and Silicon Valley Zip codes in little more than a decade. But in the hardest-hit Stockton Zip codes, homes over this same time have lost 20 percent of their value.
5
Stockton
Altamont
Pass
680
San
Francisco
Tracy
580
Livermore
880
CHANGE IN HOME VALUE
SINCE 2004 BY ZIP CODE
280
Decrease in
home values
Increase in
home values
5
20 MILES
“It was like a typhoon,” Carol Ornelas, the head of a housing nonprofit in Stockton, says of what happened out here.

The national housing market has, broadly speaking, recovered from the crash that plunged the country into a severe recession. But the recovery has also been deeply uneven, worsening divides and creating fissures across the country like the one between California’s coastal and inland communities, according to a detailed Washington Post analysis of changes in single-family home values across the country.

The analysis, a review of home-value data from Black Knight Financial Services on 19,000 Zip codes dating back to 2004, shows how the nation’s housing boom, bust and recovery over the last cycle has exacerbated inequality along lines of geography, race and income.
Here in California, it is no coincidence that the biggest victors and victims in the American housing market exist down the interstate from each other, across the Altamont Pass. Stockton’s struggles are closely tied to the Bay Area’s rise, as the two places, historically disconnected from each other, have grown into the once-empty space in between them. The pressures that have boosted home values in the Bay Area also helped push a bubble over here.

“When they weren’t all that connected, they were actually more equal,” says Jeff Michael, director of the Center for Business and Policy Research at the University of the Pacific in Stockton. Decades ago, average incomes in Stockton and San Francisco were comparable. The gap in home values between them was narrower. “And now they’re growing together and there’s this massive inequality between them.”
Enter a Zip code or city
+

© Mapbox © OpenStreetMap Improve this map, U.S. Census and Black Knight Financial Services
CHANGE IN HOME VALUE SINCE 2004
-10%0%+9%+18%+28%+40%
DOWN 21% 95206
Homes in Zip code 95206 in Stockton, Calif. are worth $54,660 less than in 2004. This is in the Stockton-Lodi, Calif. metro area.

2004
2009
2014
-100%
-50%
0%
+50%
+100%
Metro
95206
The boom years
During the boom years, the moving trucks brought over the Altamont Pass families that were priced out of increasingly expensive communities around the Bay. Hardly anyone moved in the other direction.

Those households helped bring the housing fever with them: a $400,000 enthusiasm for $200,000 homes, a faith that $400,000 homes should become $500,000 jackpots.

They brought demand for entire new subdivisions and communities built on former asparagus farms and almond orchards. And entranced by all the money the government reaped in development fees when those subdivisions were built, Stockton built a beautiful new arena downtown, next to a new minor-league ballpark, right by the site of a planned new marina on the inland channel that leads back out to the coast.

At the time, the rapidly rising home values seemed to say something about Stockton itself — that this was a place that was coming up, that was finally poised to share in the Bay Area’s prosperity.

STOCKTON, CA – APRIL 5:
Scenes around in Stockton, Calif., on Tuesday, April 5, 2016. In many parts of San Francisco, housing prices have doubled since the recession, while Stockton is still recovering. During the boom, a sculpture called ‘Stockton Rising’ was installed outside of the Stockton Arena in 2006.
(Photo by Preston Gannaway/GRAIN For The Washington Post)
A sculpture called “Stockton Rising” stands outside the Stockton Arena, one of the fruits of the city’s surge in revenue from a housing boom that turned to bust. (Preston Gannaway/Grain/For The Washington Post)

“We really did think, ‘Oh great, we’re doing better, things are looking up,’” says Jan Truscott, a real estate agent in town and the former dean of business at San Joaquin Delta College. Stockton was even on one of those lists at the time of “All-American Cities.”

This optimism created fertile ground for banks eager to hand out mortgages to virtually any family that wanted one. And then the forces collided: the surge in families moving over from the Bay, the land and support for a building boom, the subprime lenders who made it easy to buy a home with no or little money down. All those commuters created both demand for housing and the illusion that Stockton’s fortunes mirrored the Bay Area’s. And the city wanted the future the mortgage lenders were constantly predicting, one where the region would grow and values would rise indefinitely.

About the series

A bubble sent home values soaring in many U.S. cities. Their crash pulled the country into recession. After an uneven recovery, what kinds of neighborhoods are better off, or worse?

These stories map the winners and losers of this tumultuous era.

OVERVIEW
STOCKTON, CALIF.
Monday: ATLANTA, GA.
Wednesday: CHARLOTTE, N.C.
Friday, May 6: WASHINGTON, D.C.
Martin Saltzman, 64, bought his modest one-bedroom home in 2006, near the worst possible moment, with no money down. Then, shortly after he moved here from the Seattle area to be near family, the economy collapsed, and he couldn’t find work in the hospitality industry. He took up substitute teaching, and when he was home he watched one cable news show after another in his living room.

“I was watching them continuously to figure out why I was in the situation that I was,” he says, “to try to get some sense it wasn’t necessarily my fault — I just made a good decision at a bad time, or a good decision at a good time that turned bad.”

His home now is worth about half the $126,000 he paid for it. Visionary Home Builders, Ornelas’s organization, helped him refinance the property last year for a lower mortgage payment, which helped. But Saltzman wants to get out of homeowning entirely as soon as he can.

“I have no idea how long that would be,” he says. “Are we looking at another 10 years?”

In retrospect, it’s surprising to economists that prices rose so rapidly here during the boom years — even more rapidly than in the Bay.

“There was just no reason,” says Joseph Gyourko, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business. Shortly after the crash, while at a conference in San Francisco, he rented a car and drove over to see Stockton, a previously obscure place to economists that had by then become infamous as the epicenter of the nation’s foreclosure crisis. “Why you would think prices would be fundamentally higher in the Central Valley,” he says, “never made sense to me.”
Two very different California stories
Home prices have soared along the coast in California’s Bay Area. Meanwhile, inland communities that had even bigger bubbles are still struggling to recover.
CHANGE IN HOME VALUES SINCE 2004
San Jose
+54%
Counties in:
Coastal metros
Central Valley metros
U.S. avg.
+14%
CALIFORNIA
NEV.
Increase in
home values
50
MILES
Sacramento
2011
2015
2004
Stockton
Decrease in
home values
San
Francisco
Merced
-16%
Merced
San Jose
Madera
Pacific
Ocean
In San Francisco and Silicon Valley, incomes were rising during the bubble years. And the growing demand to live in the Bay Area was outstripping the supply of homes, pushing up prices. But the longtime agricultural economy in the Central Valley wasn’t taking off. Incomes weren’t rising as home prices were. And there wasn’t a shortage of housing.

In the run-up to the bust, though, very different communities started behaving similarly — not just out here, but across the country, says Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Shiller, who is credited with having predicted the housing crash when few others believed a bubble existed.

“I think that the people in the Central Valley view themselves as a different kind of Californian,” he says. These are practical agricultural people, not tech entrepreneurs; they live in spread-out ranch homes, not ornate Victorians. But in the housing frenzy, the idea of that difference broke down. Whatever was happening in the market on the coast seemed relevant to what should happen here in the great big Northern California economy.
“Speculative bubbles are social epidemics,” Shiller says, “It’s just a thing that spreads from person to person. It’s a thought virus.”

But when the bubble burst — and it burst in the Bay Area, too — places such as San Francisco and Palo Alto were much better prepared to weather the downturn. Stockton was left with bad mortgages, few high-skilled jobs and public debt that would eventually push the city into bankruptcy.

The Bay Area still had Apple and Intel and Stanford and tourists and those spectacular views of the ocean. Those communities hadn’t overbuilt because they hadn’t actually built much new housing in decades; instead, they had let places like Stockton absorb the demand.

“We were the ones benefiting from it over here for a long time,” says Patrick Wallace, association executive of the Central Valley Association of Realtors. “We were the ones selling houses. The contractors were building houses. And the cities were getting the tax revenue. So it is a double-edged sword.”

Legacy of a bust
STOCKTON, CA – APRIL 5:
Scenes around in Stockton, Calif., on Tuesday, April 5, 2016. In many parts of San Francisco, housing prices have doubled since the recession, while Stockton is still recovering. Whole sections of subdivisions were left unfinished.
(Photo by Preston Gannaway/GRAIN For The Washington Post)
STOCKTON, CA – APRIL 5:
A boarded up home in Stockton, Calif., on Tuesday, April 5, 2016. This home has been vacant the whole time he’s lived there, Eric Totman said. In many parts of San Francisco, housing prices have doubled since the recession, while Stockton is still recovering.
(Photo by Preston Gannaway/GRAIN For The Washington Post)
STOCKTON, CA – APRIL 5:
Scenes around in Stockton, Calif., on Tuesday, April 5, 2016. In many parts of San Francisco, housing prices have doubled since the recession, while Stockton is still recovering. Whole sections of subdivisions were left unfinished.
(Photo by Preston Gannaway/GRAIN For The Washington Post)
At top, fences surround an unfinished subdivision in Stockton. Above left, a boarded-up house near the home of Eric Totman, who says it has been vacant the whole time he has lived there. Above right, roads in an incomplete subdivision lead to empty lots. (Photos by Preston Gannaway/Grain/For The Washington Post)

The Weston Ranch subdivision was built right off the Interstate that leads into town, a prime location for would-be home buyers more concerned with commuting 80 miles west to the Bay Area than getting to stores or jobs in Stockton. The developers never finished it, though.

A corner of the neighborhood closest to the highway is preserved at a moment in time just before the crash: Roads for more new homes were paved there, streetlights installed and Italian cypress trees planted. But the houses those roads were supposed to lead to were never built. A chain-link fence now cordons off the property, and someone has planted a yard sign nearby aimed at the neighbors. “TE COMPRO TU CASA EN 7 DIAS O MENOS.” We buy your home in seven days or less.

In this Zip code, 95206, home values in 2015 were still 21 percent below what they were in 2004. Nearly 40 percent of the homes in Zip codes like this one along the interstate received a foreclosure notice in the first few years of the bust. The effects still linger, but they’re subtle: The occasional boarded-up window blends in with the neighborhood’s beige stucco. A scrapper has ripped the air conditioning unit off the back of one house, presumably for its copper wiring.

Eric Totman bought his house in Weston Ranch, a three-bed, three-bath foreclosure, for $145,000 in 2013. It was priced over $300,000 during the boom. When he bought it, the hallway still had crayon scribblings up the wall and an upstairs bedroom painted for a princess. Banks don’t cleanse properties of personal touches the way homeowners do when they’re trying to attract the highest bidder.

This is what Totman could afford — with space for fruit trees and a chicken coop out back — on a middle-class job 80 miles away. He is one of the fortunate ones in Stockton, in that he bought just after the bust. But he still grapples with the region’s other stark reality, because when he bought this home, he couldn’t afford to buy one anywhere closer to his job. Five days a week, he drives to Redwood City on the San Francisco Peninsula, where he owns a business coaching men’s gymnastics.

STOCKTON, CA – APRIL 5:
Eric Totman tends to his chickens at home in Stockton, Calif., on Tuesday, April 5, 2016. In many parts of San Francisco, housing prices have doubled since the recession, while Stockton is still recovering. Some people, like Totman, endure long commutes from Stockton to be able to own a home with property.
(Photo by Preston Gannaway/GRAIN For The Washington Post)
Eric Totman tends to his chickens at the Stockton home that cost him $145,000. A similar home 80 miles away in Redwood City, where he owns a business, would cost $1.5 million. (Preston Gannaway/Grain/For The Washington Post)

“A house this size in Redwood City would be a million and a half,” Totman says, pulling up impossible for-sale listings on an app on his phone. “I thought it would be closer to a million. But no. Million and a half.”

And home values in Redwood City are moving even farther out of reach by the moment. They’re up 55 to 75 percent since 2004. In some Zip codes, that’s the equivalent of more than half a million dollars in a decade. It’s the same story all around the Bay: In San Francisco Zip codes, already high home values are up 84 percent, 96 percent, and 97 percent. In Oakland Zip codes, they’re up as much as 76 percent. In Palo Alto, 155 percent.

So gymnastics coaches can’t live there. Or firefighters, teachers, nurses, cops, chefs, clerks or day-care workers. And because they can’t head west (thanks to the ocean) or north or south (where other coastal properties are pricey, too) everyone pushes inland. It’s not high-skilled tech workers moving over here; it’s the construction workers who build their offices, or the coaches who instruct their children.

Now, 45,000 workers in the county around Stockton head over the Altamont Pass every day to jobs in the Bay Area. Rush hour starts at 4 a.m. San Francisco radio stations report on traffic in the Altamont Pass.

This time of year, the drive passes by rolling green hills, topped with lonely wind turbines. But most of the rest of the year, the views are shades of brown in every direction. During times of drought, smoke rises on the horizon.

Today, more Bay Area commuters are moving in again, and construction has resumed in some subdivisions meant for them along the Interstate 580 corridor. But while that’s helping to drive prices up again, it also means that Stockton doesn’t entirely control what happens next.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA – APRIL 8:
Tourists take pictures near the famous ‘Painted Ladies’ in the Alamo Square neighborhood of San Francisco, Calif., on Friday, April 8, 2015. In many parts of San Francisco, housing prices have doubled since the recession, while the city of Stockton is still recovering.
(Photo by Preston Gannaway/GRAIN For The Washington Post)
In San Francisco, tourists photograph the famous “Painted Ladies” in the Alamo Square neighborhood. Home values have doubled in some San Francisco and Silicon Valley Zip codes since before the bubble. (Preston Gannaway/Grain/For The Washington Post)

“At some point, Stockton stopped growing in its own right and became part of something else,” says Hannah Harrison, a schoolteacher and Stockton native who moved back here after college at Berkeley when she and her husband realized that their careers would never allow them to afford the Bay Area. Now she and her husband worry about what it means for a city to become a bedroom community to someplace else very far away, to have so many children whose parents return home late every night, so many community members whose lives are fundamentally oriented elsewhere.

“At some level, why are they becoming more integrated?” asks Jeff Michael of the University of the Pacific. It’s not because Stockton is becoming more like San Francisco; it’s because Stockton is different. The Central Valley can solve problems the Bay Area has. It can build more housing when the Bay Area won’t. It can house middle-class workers when the Bay Area can’t. It can accommodate the growing number of warehouses and logistics operations that no longer make economic sense in the expensive Bay.

“Now the question is: What else?” Michael asks. “Can you take it to the next level where you start to engage in ways that don’t depend upon cheap land?”


Here’s the Plan to Turn Silver Lake Reservoir Into a Huge Park

Category : Uncategorized

All renderings via Urbanize LA

The Silver Lake Reservoir is done as a source of drinking water and today it sits empty as necessitated by construction of its replacement. As the city makes the federally mandated switch to covered or underground water storage facilities, the future of the Silver Lake and smaller Ivanhoe reservoirs lies ahead. (A beach and an esplanade have been proposed in the past.)

One local group, Silver Lake Forward, is hoping that the reservoirs, which take up about 96 acres, could be revamped as a public park. Renderings for the reimagined space, via Urbanize LA, show wide walkways and lots of seating, kind of like Echo Park Lake on steroids.

Silver Lake Forward is even considering “the possibility of linking the reservoirs to the LA River through existing pipes, creating a a storage facility for storm runoff and recycled water,” says ULA.

The conversion to a park would happen in four stages. The first stage would focus on the Silver Lake Meadow. Partnering with the LADWP, the group would either add or upgrade the existing restrooms there, increase shade in the area, create mounds for seating, and, importantly, get to work removing all the concrete they can.

The next phase would open up the area by the Eucalyptus Grove, making it more accessible to the public by taking out or relocating the fencing in the area, and adding inviting elements like furniture and walkways. This phase would also include work on a plan to reduce public access to the area during the season in which the Great Blue Heron nests.

Both these first two phases are expected to take about three to six months to complete. The first phase could begin immediately.

The next phase is actually planned to begin immediately as well, but would last between six and 12 months (so it would be happening at the same time as the first two phases). This would include some big projects, like removing the “concrete embankments” at both Ivanhoe and Silver Lake reservoirs and working on enhancing the shoreline at both.

This third phase would also include a lot of research—looking into the potential impact of creating a “promenade” between the reservoirs, watching how people use the reservoir, and considering possible impacts on traffic and parking in the neighborhood. At this time, the Silver Lake Forward group would also be looking into creating a parks assessment district or another way to generate funding for the park. In the fourth and final phase, the findings of all these studies would be put into action.


First-time buyers struggle with dwindling housing inventory

Category : Uncategorized

Homebuyers, take heed — buying a home these days can be as hostile as an arms race. Though the economy is thriving with low unemployment and mortgage rates at record-breaking lows, the housing supply hasn’t kept pace. Meanwhile, affordability continues to outpace wage growth in the majority of counties with populations over 100,000. The result is that first-time home buyers are especially deterred, the Wall Street Journal reported. Last year, they accounted for less than a third of all home purchases — the lowest in nearly 30 years, according to the National Association of Realtors. As real estate brokers gear up for the peak of the sales season — springtime through June — the squeeze will be all the more arresting. Some markets are hit worse than others. Only a quarter of U.S. counties larger than 100,000 people have real estate markets that did not see a decrease in affordability since last year, an analysis from RealtyTrac showed. Even places like the Dallas metro area, one of the most historically affordable markets in the country, have not been immune. Since 2014, the Dallas region saw 13 months of consecutive year-to-year price gains above 8 percent — nearly twice the rate of the 4.7 percent national average. “I knew things were competitive, but I didn’t expect it to be this competitive,” Nina Sastrodihardjo, a procurement manager for Hewlett Packard, told the Journal. She had to resort to an aggressive strategy in order to buy her Plano, Texas house, which she secured for $6,000 above the asking pricing and an expiration date on the offer. “You have to tackle it like a project manager,” she said. [WSJ] — Cathaleen Chen – See more at: http://therealdeal.com/la/2016/04/25/first-time-buyers-struggle-as-demand-for-housing-chafes-against-a-dwindling-supply/?utm_source=Los+Angeles&utm_campaign=f3c4a50b29-LA_WEEKLY_ROUNDUP_12_07_201512_6_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b88ce830ec-f3c4a50b29-389123705#sthash.uFab1jwY.dpuf


L.A. takes step toward legalizing bootlegged apartments

Category : Uncategorized

s Angeles lawmakers took a step Wednesday toward legalizing some “bootlegged” apartments, arguing that the city must spare them as it grapples with an affordable housing crisis.

A City Council committee backed a new ordinance that would smooth the way to legalization for apartments that are deemed safe and habitable but never got city approval.

In recent years, an unusual alliance of landlords and tenant advocates has been pushing for a new “amnesty” program that would ease the way to legalize such apartments if they met safety standards. Hundreds of apartments have been closed annually in the wake of city inspections, forcing out renters.

“Rents are going up very quickly, and incomes are not,” said Adam Murray, executive director of Inner City Law Center, which backed the proposal. “We have to do anything we can do to maintain the affordable housing that we have.”

But that rare partnership between tenant groups and landlords fractured when L.A. finally hammered out the wording of its proposed law, which would require landlords to guarantee some affordable units for more than half a century if they want to get a smoother path to legalize bootlegged apartments.

“No one is going to apply,” said Harold Greenberg, an attorney and former landlord who sits on the board of the Apartment Assn. of Greater Los Angeles. “It’s going to be like a lot of things that the housing department has — it sounds good, but no one’s going to take advantage of it.”

“Bootlegged” apartments were created without city blessing, often by walling off a bedroom or converting other space. Landlords say that in some cases, they have taken over old buildings without realizing that one or two of the apartments were not legally permitted.

Housing inspectors say many of those illegal apartments are nearly identical to lawful ones because they were carved out of legally permitted apartments. In such cases, the chief barriers to legalizing them are not construction or safety issues, but city codes that restrict how many apartments can be built there or how many parking spaces must be provided.

Landlords already could try to legalize them under existing rules but have complained that the long and costly process discouraged them from doing so.

Under the new law, the city would be able to relax some of the rules that often stop such apartments from being legalized, allowing more density and loosening parking requirements.

In return, landlords who seek to legalize bootlegged units will have to provide some affordable apartments at those buildings — and guarantee that they remain affordable for at least 55 years, under a legal covenant documented with the county recorder. City Councilman Felipe Fuentes, who had pushed the plan, called it “a very, very good trade.”

But the 55-year requirement troubled the Apartment Assn. of Greater Los Angeles, which had championed the idea of legalizing safe but illegal units.

“It becomes a potential dealbreaker” for landlords who have bootlegged units, said James Clarke, government affairs consultant with the group.

Instead of coming forward to legalize apartments, “a lot of these owners will remain in the shadows and possibly wait until they get cited to go through the process,” Clarke said.

Rick Otterstrom, a board member with the apartment association, added that even if a landlord was cited for illegal units, he or she might not find it economically sound to agree to the affordable housing guarantee, instead choosing to knock down a wall to fold an illegal unit back into a legal one.

Tenant advocates countered that a lasting guarantee of affordable housing was an important tradeoff for allowing landlords to avoid city citations and legally rent out more apartments.

“The city is giving something to landlords — but they can’t give something for free,” said Larry Gross, executive director of the Coalition for Economic Survival.

Fuentes said that whether or not landlords came forward on their own, city inspectors would ultimately find illegal units. “The choice becomes, I think, an easy one: Do you take the unit out of productive use, or do you avail yourself of a program like this one?” he said.

Under the proposed ordinance, the exact number of affordable units that landlords must provide would depend on how much extra density or other zoning modifications they are seeking in order to legalize bootlegged units.

To gain legal blessing, apartments could not have other city code violations. And the bootlegged apartments must have existed before December 10, 2015 — a rule meant to prevent landlords from hastily dividing up more apartments for city approval.

The new rules would only apply to bootlegged apartments in multifamily zones, which has made the plan less politically sensitive than targeting the illegal units tucked into areas zoned for single-family homes. A few neighborhood councils have cautiously backed the idea.

Nonetheless, the idea has alarmed some neighborhood groups that contend it will pinch parking in crowded areas and reward landlords who have flouted the law. Some are skeptical that the city will hold landlords to their promises about affordable housing.

“There’s no enforcement,” said Elizabeth A. Pollock, president of the Del Rey Residents Association. “There’s no guarantee that the units will in fact go to the people that need inexpensive housing.”

Backers of the plan argue that legalizing existing apartments will not worsen crowding or parking woes.  “The people are already there,” Gross said. “It’s not like we’re creating something new.”

But Murray said residents were right to raise concerns about how the city would enforce the affordable housing requirements. “It will require diligence” from the city and tenant groups, he said.

Los Angeles has become a poster child for unaffordable housing. Across the county, the median rent, adjusted for inflation, surged 27% between 2000 and 2013 — yet inflation-adjusted median household incomes for renters fell 7%, according to a California Housing Partnership Corporation report released last year. It estimated that more than 500,000 more affordable rental homes were needed for poor renters countywide.

The proposed law is slated to be discussed at another City Council committee before going to the entire council for a vote.